| TonyV |
|
| I think it may be to reduce size. Todays hi-def cameras imo are not as good for shooting porn as the older digital cams. There's far too much waste on the sides usually of the room. As long as the action isn't cut out I'm not that bothered by it. But all in all I'd rather see the full unedited versions. |
| Mr. Pete |
|
| So, is this true for all of those videos around 600 MB in size? This one definitely cuts off about almost a third of the picture all around the sides (you can see it when the star's name is cut off), so you get the middle of the movie. Strange! |
| biggator |
|
| Another video with half the original picture area lopped off. What purpose does this serve. Are you guys now editors/censors of each video that comes out? |
Movies are best viewed using Firefox with 
